One-third of the Palestinian journalists listed by the Committee to Protect Journalists as being killed in the war in Gaza were employed by terrorist groups, Jewish Insider has learned.
The high number of journalists reported by NGOs killed in Gaza has made headlines in the Washington Post, The New York Times and elsewhere, without any mention of their affiliations with Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Out of 100 Palestinian journalists on the list on May 17, 33 worked for “Hamas-affiliated” media, such as Al-Aqsa Voice Radio, Al-Quds Al-Youm, Quds News Network and others. Another two worked for Palestinian Islamic Jihad outlets Kan’an and Mithaq Media Foundation.
Hamas-run Al-Aqsa TV was named a Specially Designated Global Terrorist by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2010; the outlet employed 13 of those listed by CPJ.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) claims that 105 journalists were killed in Gaza, but only lists 23 of them. Several worked for terrorist organizations’ media outlets, but those affiliations are not listed on the RSF website.
So 2/3s are innocent journalists killed by the IDF?
Still record numbers. Any comments on this?
Plus as always I'm sure 'affiliated' is doing all the lifting in your claims.
Lahavs next article on how 90% of kids have walked on a street that Hamas have walked on
150% of them are, because apparently, in Gaza, math works differently.
Such a disgusting but predictable claim by genocidal Israel. Dirty, lying and immoral Israel attempting to disparage Journalists after they are murdered by them. Yuck.
Yet you fail to provide any counter arguments, just insults.
I’m not arguing- I'm expressing my disgust. Arguing is to prevent someone from being wrongfully punished. Here, uncivilized Israel already executed the Journalists without due process. No point arguing. These people cannot be brought back to life.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
Is it important to distinguish between journalists based on their employer's affiliations when reporting casualties in conflict areas?
@9MK52PW2wks2W
There is only one source offered for this information, and it is a source with an inherent bias. I would be interested to see what other investigations are turning up.
The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
