реформизъм

Съгласен

Да

Reformism generally seeks to improve social conditions and address societal issues through gradual change. Decriminalizing school truancy could be seen as a way to address the root causes of truancy, such as poverty, lack of access to quality education, and family issues, rather than punishing students. Reformists might argue that decriminalizing truancy would allow for more resources to be allocated to addressing these underlying issues and providing support to students and families. However, the score is not higher because some reformists might still see the need for some level of enforcement to ensure students attend school. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.

не съм съгласен

Не

Reformism is less likely to support the criminalization of school truancy, as it tends to focus on addressing the root causes of social issues rather than punitive measures. However, some reformists might argue that maintaining some level of enforcement is necessary to ensure students attend school and receive an education. The score is not lower because there is some variation within the reformist ideology, and not all reformists would necessarily be opposed to maintaining some level of enforcement for truancy.