This considers the idea of removing government-imposed traffic laws and relying instead on individual responsibility for road safety. Proponents argue that voluntary compliance respects individual freedom and personal responsibility. Opponents argue that without traffic laws, road safety would significantly decline and accidents would increase.
5% Yes |
95% No |
5% Yes |
95% No |
See how support for each position on “Eliminating Traffic Laws” has changed over time for 180 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Eliminating Traffic Laws” has changed over time for 180 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8RBQDDP 2wks2W
No, this is a ridiculous thing to say; rather there should be more traffic laws and better enforcement
@9MYP55X6 days6D
Voluntary compliance sounds dumb to me. We easily manipulate each other for whatever egotistical greed—so why would we trust each other for individual responsibility?
@nathanrose16 days6D
No, but the an autobahn in America that you must take tests on every year stuff like left passing and right Lane is slow traffic get out of the left lane somebody's faster and if you don't fines
@9MQ3BJM1wk1W
This is a stupid question as most traffic laws are primarily enforced via voluntary compliance and the tort system.
@9MQ2X4M1wk1W
No, and we should focus on comprehensive training and providing education to reduce traffic incidents on the road.
@9MLJ772 2wks2W
Elimination of speed limits on interstates and major highways only. Spend more on keeping people safe from harmful people rather than checking their speed and other more minor violations. Increased and sharp response to reckless driving reports.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
